Writing of the Heart: Auto-ethnographic Writing as Subversive Story Telling

Although I have taken a vacation from this particular writing project I wanted to share a parallel development.

I am slowly re-entering the world of academic conferences, but with some trepidation.  They are challenging for me, bringing to the surface all those feelings of worth – should I be here; am I a fraud?

So I am being very selective.  Consequently I found myself attracted to the Academic Identities Conference 2014 being held in Durham, UK, this summer.

I wanted to say something about how I went about writing, rather than engage in the usual round of performing propositional knowledge that makes up most academic conferences.  But I NEEDED to write my proposal in the heartfelt spirit of this project.  And so, the text below.

I am pleased to say my proposal was accepted.  Here I come Durham.

 

Writing of the Heart: Auto-ethnographic Writing as Subversive Story Telling

 

– a proposal for a Pecha Kucha presentation

 

 

How do we write of ‘academic depression’ (Jago, 2002), of the heartfelt stories of academic lives that feel like death?  I want to speak of such writing, of my first-person autoethnographic account of falling into academic depression.  And in doing this I want to speak of the struggle to create an authentic articulation between my personal and professional selves (Bochner, 1997), a struggle that reflects the lived experience of inauthenticity, of a life where relations with myself and with others were overdetermined by the demands of performativity.  As such, I want to speak of autoethnographic writing as a form of re-moralisation (Frank, 2000).  Re-moralisation relates to Arthur Frank’s argument for stories of illness as voicing the experience of those categorised by expert knowledge, defined as without voice.  And as a form of re-moralisation I want to suggest that it defines a certain ethical standpoint; a recognition that the voice of those suffering depression was like an absent presence in the academic literature.

 

Having provided an account of the re-moralising power of autoethnographic writing it seems apt to outline particular strategies for conducting writing as a kind of care of the self.  I will therefore explain how Carol Rambo Ronai (Ronai, 1998) helped me formulate a layered account, and how I was able to provide a structure for this layering through adopting the structure of alternating between the poetic reflection of ‘being there’ with the necessary engagement with academic debates and considerations (Spry, 2001).  This kind of structured layering draws on Carolyn Ellis’ (Ellis, 2007) invitation to write in a way that moves back and forth between personal introspection and academic reflection, or Behar’s (Lindisfarne, 2010) discussion of the shifts between novelistic and scholarly voices.  This movement back and forth, these different voices mirror again Bochner’s concern about the splitting of our personal and academic selves.  I argue that the very structure of the writing both reflects and challenges this rupture, and in challenging contributes to autoethnographic writing as acts of re-moralisation.

 

Finally, I want to say something about the political importance of the specific nuancing of the text.  I want to argue that the use of autoethnographic writing has power because of of the way it makes it possible for others to see their own stories validated (Ellis, 1999).  When faced with resigning themselves to institutional advancement, such stories of vulnerability can be empowering, as ‘subversive stories’ (Ewick & Silbey, 1995), that challenge hegemonic stories of academic life by reconnecting private troubles with public issues.

 

Bochner, A. P. (1997). It’s About Time: Narrative and the Divided Self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 418–438. doi:10.1177/107780049700300404

Ellis, C. (1999). Heartful Autoethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 669–683. doi:10.1177/104973299129122153

Ellis, C. (2007). Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives Relational Ethics in Research With Intimate Others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/1077800406294947

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1995). Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Towards a Sociology of Narrative. Law and Society Review, 29(2), 197–226.

Frank, A. W. (2000). The Standpoint of Storyteller. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 354–365. doi:10.1177/104973200129118499

Jago, B. J. (2002). Chronicling an Academic Depression. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31(6), 729–757. doi:10.1177/089124102237823

Lindisfarne, N. (2010). Anthropology off the shelf: anthropologists on writing – Edited by Alisse Waterston & Maria D. Vesperi. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(3), 682–683. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01646_27.x

Ronai, C. R. (1998). Sketching With Derrida: An Ethnography of a Researcher/Erotic Dancer. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(3), 405–420. doi:10.1177/107780049800400306

Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732. doi:10.1177/107780040100700605

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s